1996 PRINCETON COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN
Amendment adopted - May 15, 1997
IX. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The historical
importance of Princeton and the exceptional qualities of its historic
architecture and setting have long been recognized both in New Jersey and
throughout the country. The authors of Mansions, Mills, and Main
Streets, a 1975 guide to history and architecture within a 50-mile radius
of New York City wrote:
| In 1910 Montgomery Schuyler, dean of American architectural critics, advised the "lover of good architecture" to "go to Princeton." Good advice then; better still today, for few communities have inherited such an extraordinary legacy and guarded it more devotedly through the years. There are literally hundreds of structures of outstanding merit, from all periods, in the green valley between the Stony Brook and the Millstone River. |
This wealth of historic and cultural resources creates the unique character that is Princeton. The Historic Preservation Element's purpose is to enable the community to identify, promote, and encourage the preservation and use of these historic sites, buildings, structures, bridges, roads, and districts for the benefit of future generations.
1996 POLICY STATEMENT
The policy
expressed in the Historic Preservation Element is to promote and encourage the
preservation and enhancement of those buildings, structures and areas of
historic and aesthetic value that reflect the cultural, social, economic, and
architectural history of Princeton. Historic architecture is an essential
element of Princeton's physical image today. Historic preservation is
undertaken in order to retain buildings and areas for the education, pleasure
and welfare of the people of Princeton. The protection and enhancement of
historic sites and districts also attracts visitors to Princeton providing an
economic benefit to the community.
PRESERVING HISTORIC
PROPERTIES THROUGH OFFICIAL DESIGNATION AT THE NATIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL
LEVELS
New Jersey and National Registers of Historic
Places
The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
through 1992, promotes a federal/state/local partnership in historic
preservation. Among other provisions, it established the National Register of
Historic Places to recognize properties of state and local as well as national
significance. It provides a measure of protection for properties listed on or
determined eligible for the National Register from federally funded, licensed
or assisted projects. The responsible federal agency is required to assess the
impact of its proposed undertaking on listed or eligible properties and attempt
to avoid or mitigate any adverse impact in consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Office and a Federal Preservation entity, the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation.
New Jersey established a State Register in 1970
(N.J.S.A. 13:1B-15.128) with the same criteria for eligibility as the National
Register, making listing on the New Jersey Register a pre-requisite for
National Register listing. Listing on the New Jersey Register offers a degree
of protection against state or publicly funded projects. State register
encroachments are reviewed by the State Historic Sites Council in conjunction
with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Appendix D contains the
sites and districts in Princeton listed on the State and National Registers and
properties which have received a SHPO Opinion of Eligibility or a Determination
of Eligibility.
The relationship between these state and national
register properties and locally designed historic sites and districts are
discussed in the Existing Locally Designated Historic Districts section of this
element.
Locally Designated Historic Districts
Locally,
Princeton has a long history of public and private preservation efforts. In
1967, Princeton Borough and Township created by ordinance a Joint Historic
Sites Commission to study historic preservation and propose a common
preservation ordinance. The commission conducted a partial survey in 1968 and
proposed an ordinance in 1977 which would have created a joint landmarks
commission to designate and regulate historic sites and districts. This
ordinance was not adopted. Instead, a more comprehensive survey, the Princeton
Architectural Survey, was undertaken and completed in 1981.
In 1985,
Princeton Borough passed Ordinance #85-12, amending Sections 17A-1, 17A-2, and
17A-203 of the Code of the Borough of Princeton, New Jersey, 1974, and adding
Sections 17A-27.1 et. seq. The ordinance designated three historic districts as
zoning overlays, the Central Historic Preservation District, the Jugtown
Historic Preservation District, and the Mercer Hill Historic Preservation
District.
The ordinance was amended in 1986 to add a fourth district,
the Bank Street Historic Preservation District. The ordinance established a
Historic Preservation Review Committee (HPRC) as an advisory body to the
Princeton Regional Planning Board and the Princeton Borough Zoning Board of
Adjustment to review and comment upon proposals for alteration and new
construction within the historic districts. HPRC also assumed the review powers
exercised by the Site Plan Review Advisory Board (SPRAB) in areas of Princeton
Borough within the historic districts.
In 1987, Princeton Township also
passed a local historic district ordinance. This established a Princeton
Township Historic Preservation Commission, and set forth its powers and the
standards to be used in exercising them. The ordinance provided that the
commission would exercise powers previously delegated to SPRAB for minor
applications within designated historic districts and would share such powers
with SPRAB for major applications. In addition, the ordinance contained a new
Subdivision XIII of Article XI, enabling the Township to designated Historic
Buffer Zoning Districts. Fifteen sites and districts have been designated by
ordinance. These and more recent additions are listed in this Element.
1996 - 2001 GOALS
| I. | Identify and document historic buildings, structures, sites, roads and districts. | |
| II. | Promote appropriate utilization of historic properties. | |
| III. | Protect and enhance historic properties. | |
| IV. | Protect historic and scenic sites from governmental projects. | |
| V. | Promote appreciation of historic properties. | |
1989 - 1996 CHANGES
Since 1989,
there have been a number of actions to ensure that historically significant
sites in the Princeton Community will be preserved. In Princeton Borough, the
focus was on design review within the four locally-designated historic
districts. In Princeton Township, there were ordinance changes to facilitate
preservation efforts: a program for premapping sites was begun, several
properties were listed on the State and National Registers, and one new local
zoning overlay district was created.
Additions to the State and
National Registers:
|
Ordinance Changes
A number of technical
changes have been made to the ordinances which control historic preservation in
Princeton Township. Three notable amendments were adopted in 1992.
|
1996 - 2001 STRATEGIES
| I. | Identify and document historic buildings, structures, sites, roads and districts | |
| A. | Expand, maintain, and update the Princeton Architectural Survey. | |
| B. | Focus additional surveys on historic and scenic roads, bridges, streamscapes, landscapes, especially those which may be endangered. | |
| II. | Promote appropriate utilization of historic properties | |
| A. | Promote original and/or present use of historic properties in their original location whenever feasible and encourage sympathetic adaptive use when original or present use is no longer feasible. | |
| B. | Review zoning ordinances to ensure they encourage the preservation of historic properties and revise zoning ordinances to make them compatible with preservation goals. | |
| C. | Encourage cluster zoning, utilization of transfer of development rights for non-contiguous planned development as allowed by MLUL, and other mechanisms to utilize historic properties and protect their historic landscape features. | |
| D. | Require local officials to consider preservation goals in interpreting regulations and building codes; train local officials quickly in the new New Jersey Rehabilitation Code if and when it takes effect | |
| E. | Work with landowners, public and private agencies to encourage the preservation, acquisition and maintenance of endangered historic properties. | |
| III. | Protect and enhance historic properties | |
| A. | List by importance those historic properties, sites, buildings, structures, and districts that require protection and recommend appropriate local ordinances to effect that protection. | |
| B. | Review boundaries of locally designated districts and revise boundaries as appropriate in accordance with standards set forth in this Element. | |
| C. | Encourage state legislation permitting Transfer of Development Rights for historic properties. | |
| D. | Revise Borough Ordinances as needed to enable the designation of individual properties. | |
| E. | Intervening or surrounding properties that significantly affect the quality and character of an existing or potential historic site (or sites) should be reviewed for inclusion in a historic buffer district. A historic buffer district ordinance should be studied as a means to protect historic preservation districts. | |
| F. | Review and develop new design standards as needed for historic districts. | |
| G. | Encourage parking design for historic districts that is unobtrusive, minimizing the effect on the historic character of the setting. Parking should be limited to that necessary to serve the proposed use. | |
| H. | Accept donations of property, grants of easements, and other forms of less than fee-simple ownership of historic properties. | |
| I. | Encourage utility companies to plan, schedule, and design infrastructure improvements in a manner that is sensitive to the scale and character of historic and scenic roads and bridges. Develop design standards and other preservation tools for historic bridges and roads | |
| IV. | Protect historic and scenic sites from governmental projects | |
| A. | Nominate additional sites and districts to the State and National Registers. Investigate other types of designation or legislation that might be available for historic roads and bridges and to protect the mature landscape and historic streetscape elements along these corridors. | |
| B. | Encourage governmental officials to plan, schedule, and design infrastructure improvements in a manner that is sensitive to the scale and character of historic and scenic roads and bridges. Develop design standards and other preservation tools for historic bridges and roads. | |
| C. | Promote public awareness of government projects which conflict with community preservation goals. | |
| V. | Promote appreciation of historic properties | |
| A. | Make available to local officials and the general public the Princeton Architectural Survey and all designation surveys, photographs, and maps. Prepare and disseminate brochures and/or guides to historic architecture and preservation in Princeton. | |
| B. | Work with homeowners and the business community to develop a comprehensive signage system to inform the public of historically significant sites throughout the community. | |
CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR DESIGNATING LOCAL
HISTORIC SITES AND DISTRICTS
Eligibility for local
designation of sites and historic preservation districts is the same as for the
State and National Registers. The designated area must be historically or
architecturally significant on the national, state, or local level, possess
integrity (i.e. a high degree of character-defining features) from the period
during which it earned its significance. Criteria: The quality of significance
in American history, architecture, archeology, culture, and engineering is
present in districts, sites, buildings, structure, and objects that possess
integrity of location, design, setting, materials workmanship, feeling, and
association, and :
| A. | that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our past; or | |
| B. | that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or | |
| C. | that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or | |
| D. | that have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. | |
Principles to be used in delineating the boundaries of
historic districts are listed in Appendix D.
CRITERIA AND
STANDARDS FOR DESIGNATING HISTORIC BUFFER DISTRICTS
Historic
buffer districts should include intervening or surrounding property
significantly affecting by the quality and character of existing or potential
historic site or sites. A historic buffer district serves as a buffer zone to
historic preservation districts. By virtue of their location, historic buffer
districts serve as a gateway or transition to existing or proposed historic
preservation district and changes to its streetscape, landscape, or buildings
visually affect the historic preservation district to which it connects.
Prior to the designation of a historic buffer district, a brief report
which includes a statement of significance, building descriptions, photographs,
boundary description/justification, map, statement of what is subject to
review, relation to adjacent historic district and design standards or
guidelines must be prepared.
EXISTING LOCALLY DESIGNATED
HISTORIC DISTRICTS
Princeton Borough:
|
The local Jugtown district boundaries are the same as the
State and National Register Jugtown District; its significance is detailed on
the nomination form submitted to the Registers. The remaining three districts
fall within, but do not coincide with the Princeton Historic District entered
on the State and National Registers. The significance and boundary
justification for these three districts were prepared by the Joint Historic
Preservation Commission whose report formed part of the legislative history for
the Borough ordinance establishing these districts. The significance and
boundary justification for the Bank Street Historic District were prepared by
the Princeton Borough HPRC.
Princeton Township:
|
The location of these districts is shown on the Historic
Districts of Princeton map found at the end of this Element.
Two
National Register Historic Districts are not locally designated:
The
Mountain Avenue Historic District is on the north side of
Mountain Avenue between the west side of the Mountain Lakes Preserve and Quarry
Lane. It forms a unique enclave of middle-class suburban development of the
late 19th and early 20th centuries and is associated with the shift of a
long-established local family from agriculture to other pursuits.
The
Lake Carnegie Historic District includes the first
artificially made lake in the United States created for crew racing. Since its
construction in 1905-06, it has been the site of Olympic trials in 1936 and
1948, and several national major intercollegiate rowing events.
SUGGESTED HISTORIC SITES AND DISTRICTS
The
following listings compiled by the Borough's Historic Preservation Review
Committee and the Township's Historic Preservation Committee should be
evaluated for nomination on the New Jersey and National Registers. Based upon
the results of these evaluations designation as local historic sites, districts
or buffer districts should be considered.
Princeton Borough
|
Princeton Township:
|
Inter-Municipal Properties
|
Roads
|
Bridges
The following bridges should be
studied to determine if they are eligible for designation as a local, state or
national historic structures.
|
GATEWAYS
Almost all of the
entrances to Princeton are visually recognizable as marking a transition to an
area with a distinctive character, conveying the sense of a place
differentiated from its surroundings. These "gateways" do not necessarily
coincide with municipal boundaries, but rather with geographical features and
historical development related to the growth of Princeton's transportation
network. Many of these gateways are associated with historic districts, sites
and structures. Appendix D discusses the gateway in greater detail.